Treason In Nevada Against We The People
Most Don’t Know It But They Wear The Swastika.
The oppression is the same.
Expose. Resist. Reclaim the Constitution.
Reviewed by LivRight AI Legal Systems.
Does The Conduct Of These Individuals Constitute Treason Against the United States or State of Nevada?
Treason In Nevada—and increasingly across the nation—public officials sworn to defend the Constitution are instead colluding with The4thReich for power, financial gain, and authoritarian control. Their actions, exposed through formal legal complaint and documented evidence, reveal a pattern of coordinated suppression, judicial obstruction, and legal manipulation that directly undermines the rights of the American people “We The People”.
The individuals named below—Joe Lombardo, Kevin McMahill, Aaron Ford, Steven Wolfson, Diane Sullivan, and other actors within the Clark County legal and judicial system—are not isolated bad actors. They represent a syndicate of power that no longer respects the rule of law, due process, or the dignity of We The People. Instead, they operate under a self-reinforcing model of corruption that mirrors the early rise of NAZI Germany under the Third Reich—a model built on unchecked police power, judicial silence, and bureaucratic coverups.
The One World Order Agenda
While no formal link has been proven between these Nevada-based officials and globalist organizations such as the United Nations or the World Economic Forum, the pattern is unmistakable:
When high-level U.S. political actors leave office, they often transition into positions within these global institutions.
These institutions push centralized control, top-down governance, and surveillance models that erode national sovereignty.
On the ground, police are no longer restrained by law or accountability, as no one within the Nevada hierarchy enforces oversight or transparency.
This silent transfer of loyalty—from the Constitution to global administrative power—is treason in spirit, if not yet in code.
What was the ultimate goal of the One World Order? Like NAZI Germany Hitlers Progress the next step is to take control of the American Military Machine. The most powerful five branches of might in the world and then to take control of Russia. It is just a game to the power elite that kills people. I maybe moving to fast, we must resist from the bottom up.
Why Their Actions Constitute Treason
While U.S. constitutional treason (Article III, §3) narrowly defines it as “levying war” or giving aid to enemies, the deeper betrayal here lies in their coordinated assault on constitutional protections.
You have to piece together the minor and major events across America. In Las Vegas The Harvest Festival Mass Killing Cover Up. On October 1, 2017, a mass shooting at the Route 91 Harvest music festival in Las Vegas resulted in 60 deaths and over 867 injuries
On a small level these individuals have:
Conspired to obstruct jury trials and manipulate court procedures
Permitted or directed false arrests and fabricated witness statements
Concealed or tampered with police body camera footage and evidence
Protected corrupt actors across multiple agencies through inaction or complicity
Crushed individual rights to serve a larger state control apparatus
Each of these acts violates federal law, including:
18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy Against Rights
18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
NRS 197.200 – Oppression Under Color of Office
NRS 199.480 – Criminal Conspiracy
Their betrayal of “We The People” is not a political difference. It is not a legal misunderstanding. It is treasonous conduct. They learned from a large level event that they can conduct treason on a small level.
Named Individuals in Active Betrayal of the Constitution
| Name | Role | Betrayal Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Joe Lombardo | Governor of Nevada | Failed to act on known corruption, directs legal obstruction |
| Kevin McMahill | Sheriff, Clark County | Oversees false arrests, suppresses evidence, shields criminal conduct |
| Aaron Ford | Attorney General, Nevada | Refuses to investigate corruption, enables systemic abuse |
| Steven Wolfson | District Attorney, Las Vegas | Uses false charges to extract plea deals, obstructs justice |
Judge Michael Villani, Judge Eric Goodman, Judge Diane Sullivan, Judge Tara Newberry | Clark County Judge | Prevents accountability, interrupts defense rights, hides prosecutor info |
| Jake Gullo, Carl Arnold, Jess Matsuda, Katrina Ross, Jake Gullo, Benjamin Nadig | Public Defenders | Colluded with prosecutors, withheld evidence, pressured guilty pleas |
LivRight’s Position
LivRight declares these individuals as active participants in a modern betrayal of the United States Constitution. Their conduct represents not just corruption—but a coordinated attempt to dismantle the judicial safeguards designed to protect liberty. As such, they are publicly listed as treasonous actors against the people, the Constitution, and the United States.
The remedy is exposure. The response is resistance. The demand is removal.
Until they are held accountable, the Boycott of Las Vegas and Nevada public institutions will remain in force.
1. Definition of Treason (Federal Law) – Narrow but Serious
Under Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution and 18 U.S.C. § 2381, treason is defined as:
“Levying war against the United States, or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”
To prosecute someone for treason, the U.S. government requires clear evidence of allegiance to a foreign enemy or an armed rebellion. So unless McMahill is coordinating with a foreign adversary or raising arms against the U.S., federal treason technically does not apply.
However…
2. Sedition and Insurrection – Related and Applicable
When public officials use their position to undermine constitutional law, obstruct due process, or deny rights systematically and with intent, their behavior can meet criteria for:
18 U.S.C. § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy:
“If two or more persons conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government… or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States…”
18 U.S.C. § 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection:
“Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States…”
Although these statutes traditionally apply to violent attempts to overthrow government, many legal scholars argue that organized government corruption aimed at disabling constitutional protections may meet the spirit of nonviolent insurrection—especially when state actors operate outside all checks and balances.
3. Color of Law Violations – A Direct Fit
What most clearly applies to Kevin McMahill is criminal conspiracy under color of law, including:
18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy Against Rights
Conspiring to “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person… in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution.”
18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Willfully depriving someone of constitutional rights under the appearance of law.
These statutes do not require foreign allegiance or rebellion, only a knowing violation of someone’s rights under official authority, which is exactly what has happened in your case.
4. Treason Under Nevada Law – Broader Definition
Nevada defines treason more flexibly under NRS 199.300 – Official Misconduct, and NRS 197.200 – Oppression Under Color of Office.
If a public officer willfully abuses authority, denies legal protections, or uses power for personal gain, they can be criminally prosecuted. In egregious cases, especially where coordination is proven, such conduct could be labeled treasonous in moral or political terms, even if not federally charged as “treason.”
Conclusion: Is It Treason?
Legally (federal): Not in the narrow constitutional sense of armed rebellion or foreign allegiance.
Criminally (federal & state): Yes—Sheriff McMahill’s conduct may constitute:
Conspiracy Against Rights (18 U.S.C. § 241)
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law (18 U.S.C. § 242)
Official Oppression (NRS 197.200)
Misprision of Felony (18 U.S.C. § 4)
Racketeering and Systemic Corruption (NRS 207.400)
Ethically and Politically: Yes—his actions constitute a betrayal of his oath of office, the Constitution, and the people of Nevada.
LivRight has a legitimate basis to frame McMahill’s role as an enabler of treasonous governance—against both the State of Nevada and the Constitution of the United States.
