Tony Worthman Investigator Las Vegas

🔍 LivRIGHT Public Servant Profile: Tony Worthman

Name: Tony Worthman
Position: State of Nevada Public Investigator (Assigned by Public Defender Jake Gullo)
Federal Case No: 25-CV-636-APG-BNW
Role: Key defendant in a RICO, Hobbs Act, and civil rights lawsuit
Status: Accused of racketeering, obstruction, and conspiracy under color of law

⚖️ Summary of Alleged Misconduct:

Tony Worthman conspired with public defenders Jake Gullo and Katrina Ross to coerce Plaintiff Russell Martin into a fraudulent guilty plea using deceit, threats, and manufactured evidence. Rather than investigate the case objectively, Worthman:

• Fabricated false witness statements

• Refused to document exculpatory witness interviews

• Threatened Plaintiff with five years in prison and $10,000 in fines

• Withheld bodycam footage and exculpatory photos

• Refused to perform a background check on Moos (retired officer and aggressor)

• Knowingly presented manipulated facts to induce a plea agreement

• Participated in a systemic scheme to extract guilty pleas for grant funding and conviction stats

🚨 Violated Laws & Legal Principles:

Federal Crimes

• 18 U.S.C. § 1962 – RICO Act: Engaged in a pattern of racketeering with state actorsRussell Complaint (10)

• 18 U.S.C. § 1951 – Hobbs Act: Extortion and economic coercion through legal abuseRussell Complaint (10)

• 18 U.S.C. § 1503 – Obstruction of Justice: Suppressed and misrepresented evidenceRussell Complaint (10)

• 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512–1515 – Witness Tampering: Fabricated and manipulated testimonyRussell Complaint (10)

Constitutional Violations

• Fourth Amendment: Deprivation of liberty under false pretenses

• Fifth Amendment: Coerced self-incrimination and deprivation of due process

• Sixth Amendment: Failure to ensure effective investigative support

• Fourteenth Amendment: Equal protection and due process violationsRussell Complaint (10)

Civil & Professional Liability

• 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Civil rights violations

• Brady v. Maryland: Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence

• Legal Malpractice: Breach of fiduciary duty owed to Plaintiff

• Fraud and Misrepresentation: Knowingly advancing false evidence

🛑 Pattern of Racketeering (Predicate Acts)

• Withholding exculpatory witness interviews

• Threatening Plaintiff with harsh sentencing to extract plea

• Misleading Plaintiff into believing trial was unwinnable

• Obstructing access to police bodycam evidence

• Creating an environment of fear and intimidation

• Colluding with co-defendants to protect Moos, the aggressor

💥 Damages to Plaintiff:

• Destruction of businesses (GYMStarPro, StarSEO)

• Economic collapse and lost income

• Reputational damage due to coerced felony plea

• Inability to support daughter’s education

• Psychological distress and forced self-representation

• Loss of liberty, freedom of movement, and professional opportunitiesRussell Complaint (10)

📣 Recommended Accountability:

1. Criminal Referral

• To the U.S. Department of Justice and Attorney General

• For violations under RICO, Hobbs Act, and obstruction laws

2. Bar and Agency Complaint

• File with Nevada State Public Defender and State Investigative Oversight Authority

• Include findings of witness tampering and coercion

3. Federal Civil Suit

• Continued prosecution for civil rights violations under §1983

• Demand for full compensatory and punitive damages

📰 LivRIGHT Website Disclosure Template:

Tony Worthman: The Investigator Who Helped Manufacture a Felony

Tony Worthman served as the “investigator” for public defender Jake Gullo but instead of protecting the rights of the accused, he helped build a fraudulent case against an innocent man. Worthman fabricated witness statements, refused to document character witness interviews, and actively suppressed exculpatory evidence. Alongside Gullo and Katrina Ross, he created a coercive legal trap that forced Russell Martin into a “No Contest” plea — a plea extracted through threats, lies, and systemic misconduct. Worthman’s actions enriched the Nevada legal system while destroying the Plaintiff’s businesses, freedom, and family life. LivRIGHT demands federal prosecution, civil liability, and immediate disqualification from any public service.