Aaron Ford Attorney General Nevada
Statement from Russell Martin
Treason In Nevada
Leader of a Broken Corrupt System of Justice.
Statement from Russell Martin, Defendant
Aaron Ford – Attorney General, State of Nevada
I submitted documented evidence of criminal misconduct to Aaron Ford’s office multiple times. No action was ever taken. Just like Internal Affairs, the Nevada Bar Association, the Commission on Judicial Discipline, the District Attorney’s office, and the FBI, his office is part of a coordinated smokescreen—a business model of state corruption.
This system manipulates individuals into pleading guilty to lesser charges, not for justice but to sustain government income and protect state employees. It operates like a legal mafia—prosecuting people without transparency or accountability. When my charges were dropped, I asked who altered the documents. There was no name.
Public Employees Refused To Expose Their Names.
When I demanded to know the prosecutor’s identity, Judge Diane Sullivan interrupted me and the prosecutor refused to disclose her full name.
This is how the legal system evolves into a NAZI SS-style machine, where shadow prosecutions and hidden leadership pave the way toward social control and the coming Social Score system.
Why LivRight?
You must grasp the purpose of LivRight. The legal system today functions as a criminal monopoly. Every tool it gives you is a trap, designed to manipulate, isolate, and finally, force a guilty plea. You do not yet understand how deep the deception goes. But AI does. That’s why LivRight exists.
Watch the LivRight AI video disclosure and discover the laws that were designed to protect you—but are now hidden behind courtroom theatrics and judicial arrogance. Without LivRight, your life can spiral out of control, just like mine did. For two years, I believed the lie that justice was possible through the system. I was wrong. The individuals exposed on LivRight are not the exception—they are the norm.
People Go To Jail For Crimes They Did Not Commit.
These people will put you in prison for life—not for justice, but for power, profit, and political promotion. They thrive on fear, feed off ignorance, and weaponize your trust. The system is progressive the same as what happened in WW2 when the police became NAZI’s . The system is maturing into The4thReich. Their success depends on your silence.
So fight back. Get educated fast. Build your defense with AI. If your attorney won’t follow orders, fire them. Record everything. Publish the truth. List their name on LivRight. Then, connect with real leaders—wherever they are in the world.
Because your freedom depends on action, not permission.
A Warning to All Defendants / Plaintiffs
USE AI To Discover What Your Attorney and judge Is NOT DOING.
Be cautious with any attorney appointed to you or you are paying for his services. Develop your own legal plan. If your attorney refuses to follow your strategy or blocks your access to justice, discharge them immediately and find one who will fight for you per AI instructions.
Russell Martin
Legal Watch: Aaron Ford Attorney General
“Justice is not a commodity. It’s a right.”
🔍 LivRIGHT AI Legal Response:
The Legal and Constitutional Duties of the Attorney General of Nevada
Subject: Aaron Ford – Attorney General, State of Nevada
The Attorney General (AG) is the chief legal officer of the state, responsible for upholding the law, protecting the rights of the people, and ensuring that public officials and institutions operate within the boundaries of the Constitution.
When presented with credible evidence of criminal misconduct, civil rights violations, prosecutorial abuse, or systemic corruption within Nevada’s justice system, Attorney General Aaron Ford has the following non-discretionary duties:
1. Duty to Investigate and Enforce the Law
Under Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) § 228.110, the Attorney General must institute investigations and prosecute violations of law when public officials or agencies are accused of criminal behavior. Ignoring credible evidence of wrongdoing violates both statutory authority and constitutional responsibility.
2. Duty to Uphold the Nevada and U.S. Constitutions
The Attorney General takes an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Nevada. If the legal system is being used to coerce guilty pleas, falsify records, or deny due process, the AG must act immediately to restore justice and prevent irreparable harm to the public.
3. Oversight of Legal and Judicial Accountability Agencies
The AG has influence and legal standing to intervene or initiate corrective action against state agencies like:
The Nevada Bar Association
The Commission on Judicial Discipline
District Attorneys
Public Defenders
Internal Affairs Departments
Failure to supervise these bodies, or to refer misconduct to independent investigators when internal processes are compromised, constitutes dereliction of duty.
4. Obligation to Protect Whistleblowers and Complainants
When individuals, such as Russell Martin, bring documented disclosures to the AG’s office, they are exercising protected rights under First Amendment redress and whistleblower protections. The Attorney General is required by law to respond—not ignore. Repeated inaction or concealment of reports may be grounds for:
Civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charges of misprision of felony (18 U.S.C. § 4)
Professional discipline or removal from office
Conclusion
If Attorney General Aaron Ford has received credible documentation of illegal conduct within Nevada’s justice system and failed to investigate, refer, or prosecute these violations, he is not upholding the law—he is obstructing it.
Such failure is not merely a policy decision—it is a legal and constitutional breach, placing the Attorney General in direct conflict with the very oath he swore to uphold.
Carl Arnold Is Guilty of the Following Chargeable Offenses:
Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Russell Martin
As appointed defense counsel, Carl Arnold had a legal obligation to act solely in the interest of his client. By abandoning communication, disregarding motions, and failing to follow through on promised actions, he violated this fundamental duty of loyalty and care.Stonewalling Court Proceedings
Arnold actively delayed or obstructed progress in Mr. Martin’s case by failing to file critical motions, ignoring direct inquiries, and avoiding procedural follow-up. This inaction directly contributed to prolonged exposure to unjust prosecution.Refusing to Investigate the False Arrest Report
Despite having access to evidence contradicting the claims made in the police report, Arnold refused to challenge or investigate the legitimacy of the charges, allowing fabricated allegations to remain unopposed.
Failing to Suppress The Judge to Obey The Constitution of the United States.
Concealing Robert Moos’s Status as a Retired Police Chief
Carl Arnold allegedly withheld material information about the assailant’s law enforcement background, which could have shown bias in arrest and prosecution decisions and revealed systemic protectionism.Withholding Bodycam Footage and Photographic Evidence
Although body camera footage and photographs were essential to Mr. Martin’s defense, Arnold failed to demand their production or disclose their contents, thus suppressing potentially exonerating evidence.Failing to Inform the Court That Mr. Martin Never Struck Robert Moos
Arnold neglected to present a basic factual defense: that the Plaintiff never made physical contact with the alleged victim. This omission materially weakened Mr. Martin’s position and violated fundamental trial obligations.
Refusing to obey fundamentals of Due Process of Law
- Refusing to Confront False and Manifested Witness Statements Rather than object to or challenge fraudulent testimonies, Arnold allowed false witness statements to enter the court record without opposition—effectively aiding the prosecution’s false narrative.
Allowing the Use of Manufactured Testimony Containing Multiple False Claims
Two witness statements, each containing demonstrable fabrications, were permitted to proceed under Arnold’s watch, with no motion filed to exclude or investigate them.Colluding with Judges to Pressure a Guilty Plea
Arnold participated in off-record bench meetings with prosecutors and judges, after which the trajectory of the case shifted. These meetings and subsequent non-action suggest coordination intended to coerce Mr. Martin into a guilty plea, rather than pursuing acquittal.
Available Records Include:
Gabriel Villanueva – Manifested Embellished Arrest Report- Gabriel Villanueva – Manifested Embellished Arrest Report Blacked Out.
- Chris Adamson – False Witness Statement Created by Jake Gullo
- Ken Sole – False Witness Statement Created by Jake Gullo
- Robert Moos Declaration to Reinstate Club Membership. Shows pictures of signup board
- Las Vegas Metro Police – Declaration of Arrest (Blacked Out)
- Photo Evidence – Robert Moos (Back of Head, No Facial Injuries)
- Photo Evidence – Robert Moos (Back of Head, Close-Up With Stitches)
Each document and image included here is public evidence of a criminal legal system operating as a mafia-style monopoly. From tampering with evidence to deliberately manufacturing falsehoods, the entire process—police, prosecutors, judges, and defenders—appears designed to profit from wrongful convictions. Is our legal system capable of becoming an NAZI system?
