Kevin McMahill Sheriff, Clark County, Nevada
Statement from Russell Martin
Treason In Nevada
Leader of a Broken Corrupt System of Justice for Profit and Power.
Kevin McMahill Sheriff – I submitted documented evidence of criminal misconduct to Keven McMahill Sheriff when I did not know he was one of the leaders of the business model.
Kevin McMahill Sheriff has violated the sacred trust embedded in the Constitution of the United States—the very foundation that protects individual rights and guarantees due process. Alongside Joe Lombardo, Aaron Ford, Steve Wolfson, and the Nevada Superior Courts, McMahill has become a central figure in a coordinated conspiracy to obstruct justice and enrich government actors at the public’s expense.
The law in Nevada now teeters on the edge of organized anarchy. Yet this breakdown is not accidental—it reflects the deliberate goal of the One World Order. Why, because other states are performing in the same objective manner. As this system grows more corrupt, the people’s only protection is the Constitution and their absolute right to a jury trial. Despite this, every arm of the legal system—public defenders, prosecutors, judges, and law enforcement—has acted in unison to strip Russell Martin of that right.
Even though the only charge remaining is a misdemeanor battery, which explicitly guarantees a jury trial under state law, the system has denied him justice at every turn. That is the leadership model of Joe Lombardo and The4thReich, now fully embraced by Kevin McMahill and the police and sheriff departments.
Kevin McMahill Sheriff
Russell Martin continues to face retaliation and fear of the police. Police are actively withholding bodycam footage, concealing photographic evidence, and releasing tampered videos with deleted audio and missing content. In response, Mr. Martin submitted a comprehensive disclosure package and officially activated LivRight’s engagement.
LivRight now demands the resignation of Kevin McMahill. If he refuses, the Boycott of Las Vegas will escalate until every official supporting this corrupted machine is removed from power. The people must take back their courts, their Constitution, and their future.
Why LivRight?
You must grasp the purpose of LivRight. The legal system today functions as a criminal monopoly. Every tool it gives you is a trap, designed to manipulate, isolate, and finally, force a guilty plea. You do not yet understand how deep the deception goes. But AI does. That’s why LivRight exists.
Watch the LivRight AI video disclosure and discover the laws that were designed to protect you—but are now hidden behind courtroom theatrics and judicial arrogance. Without LivRight, your life can spiral out of control, just like mine did. For two years, I believed the lie that justice was possible through the system. I was wrong. The individuals exposed on LivRight are not the exception—they are the norm.
People Go To Jail For Crimes They Did Not Commit.
These people will put you in prison for life—not for justice, but for power, profit, and political promotion. They thrive on fear, feed off ignorance, and weaponize your trust. The system is progressive the same as what happened in WW2 when the police became NAZI’s . The system is maturing into The4thReich. Their success depends on your silence.
So fight back. Get educated fast. Build your defense with AI. If your attorney won’t follow orders, fire them. Record everything. Publish the truth. List their name on LivRight. Then, connect with real leaders—wherever they are in the world.
Because your freedom depends on action, not permission.
A Warning to All Defendants / Plaintiffs
USE AI To Discover What Your Attorney and judge Is NOT DOING.
Be cautious with any attorney appointed to you or you are paying for his services. Develop your own legal plan. If your attorney refuses to follow your strategy or blocks your access to justice, discharge them immediately and find one who will fight for you per AI instructions.
Russell Martin
Legal Watch: Steven Wolfson District Attorney Las Vegas
“Justice is not a commodity. It’s a right.”
🔍 LivRIGHT AI Legal Response:
The Legal Duties and Liabilities of Sheriff Kevin McMahill, Clark County, Nevada
Filed by: Russell Martin, Defendant
Reviewed by: LivRight AI Legal System
1. Duty to Uphold Constitutional Rights
As the chief law enforcement officer of Clark County, Sheriff Kevin McMahill is sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution, the Nevada Constitution, and state and federal laws. His authority carries a direct obligation to protect individuals from unlawful arrests, evidence suppression, and due process violations. When a sheriff’s office knowingly withholds or manipulates evidence, it commits an active violation of the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
Violation: 14th Amendment – Denial of Due Process
Violation: 6th Amendment – Denial of the Right to Confront Evidence and Witnesses
Violation: 5th Amendment – Deprivation of Liberty Without Legal Process
Violation: 4th Amendment – Unlawful Seizure and False Arrest
2. Duty to Preserve and Disclose Evidence
Sheriff McMahill has a legal obligation under Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 289 and Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), to preserve and disclose any evidence favorable to the accused. If body camera footage, photographs, or official reports are altered, withheld, or deleted, it violates Brady obligations and constitutes willful obstruction of justice.
Violation: Brady v. Maryland – Suppression of Exculpatory Evidence
Violation: NRS 199.480 – Conspiracy to Commit an Offense
Violation: NRS 207.400 – Racketeering / Pattern of Unlawful Activity
Violation: NRS 239.320 – Falsification or Destruction of Public Records
3. Prohibition Against Tampering With Evidence and Reports
Sheriff McMahill must ensure the integrity of all investigative material. When police officers under his authority alter, redact, or destroy video and photographic evidence, he cannot ignore these acts. Instead, he must investigate and correct them. If he fails, he becomes personally liable under both state criminal law and federal civil rights law.
Violation: NRS 199.220 – Destroying or Concealing Evidence
Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1519 – Destruction, Alteration, or Falsification of Records in Federal Investigations
Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Violation: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
4. Misprision of Felony and Dereliction of Duty
When a public official learns of a felony and fails to report or act, he commits misprision of felony under federal law. Moreover, as an elected official, McMahill is duty-bound to respond to citizen complaints, evidence disclosures, and allegations of criminal conduct. His refusal to intervene or initiate oversight makes him legally complicit in the acts committed by his subordinates.
Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 4 – Misprision of Felony
Violation: NRS 197.230 – Officer Refusing to Perform Duty
Violation: NRS 197.200 – Oppression Under Color of Office
Conclusion
Sheriff Kevin McMahill has received documented notice of police misconduct, falsified reports, video tampering, and coordinated efforts to obstruct justice. Yet he has taken no corrective action. Under both state and federal law, he is now legally exposed to civil liability, criminal prosecution, and public removal from office.
LivRight AI therefore recommends immediate litigation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal investigation, and the initiation of a state-level complaint for dereliction of duty.
Justice requires accountability. Authority demands integrity. Kevin McMahill has failed on both fronts.
criminal investigation into his conduct. The duty of a prosecutor is to uphold the law—not to weaponize it.
Carl Arnold Is Guilty of the Following Chargeable Offenses:
Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Russell Martin
As appointed defense counsel, Carl Arnold had a legal obligation to act solely in the interest of his client. By abandoning communication, disregarding motions, and failing to follow through on promised actions, he violated this fundamental duty of loyalty and care.Stonewalling Court Proceedings
Arnold actively delayed or obstructed progress in Mr. Martin’s case by failing to file critical motions, ignoring direct inquiries, and avoiding procedural follow-up. This inaction directly contributed to prolonged exposure to unjust prosecution.Refusing to Investigate the False Arrest Report
Despite having access to evidence contradicting the claims made in the police report, Arnold refused to challenge or investigate the legitimacy of the charges, allowing fabricated allegations to remain unopposed.
Failing to Suppress The Judge to Obey The Constitution of the United States.
Concealing Robert Moos’s Status as a Retired Police Chief
Carl Arnold allegedly withheld material information about the assailant’s law enforcement background, which could have shown bias in arrest and prosecution decisions and revealed systemic protectionism.Withholding Bodycam Footage and Photographic Evidence
Although body camera footage and photographs were essential to Mr. Martin’s defense, Arnold failed to demand their production or disclose their contents, thus suppressing potentially exonerating evidence.Failing to Inform the Court That Mr. Martin Never Struck Robert Moos
Arnold neglected to present a basic factual defense: that the Plaintiff never made physical contact with the alleged victim. This omission materially weakened Mr. Martin’s position and violated fundamental trial obligations.
Refusing to obey fundamentals of Due Process of Law
- Refusing to Confront False and Manifested Witness Statements Rather than object to or challenge fraudulent testimonies, Arnold allowed false witness statements to enter the court record without opposition—effectively aiding the prosecution’s false narrative.
Allowing the Use of Manufactured Testimony Containing Multiple False Claims
Two witness statements, each containing demonstrable fabrications, were permitted to proceed under Arnold’s watch, with no motion filed to exclude or investigate them.Colluding with Judges to Pressure a Guilty Plea
Arnold participated in off-record bench meetings with prosecutors and judges, after which the trajectory of the case shifted. These meetings and subsequent non-action suggest coordination intended to coerce Mr. Martin into a guilty plea, rather than pursuing acquittal.
Available Records Include:
Gabriel Villanueva – Manifested Embellished Arrest Report- Gabriel Villanueva – Manifested Embellished Arrest Report Blacked Out.
- Chris Adamson – False Witness Statement Created by Jake Gullo
- Ken Sole – False Witness Statement Created by Jake Gullo
- Robert Moos Declaration to Reinstate Club Membership. Shows pictures of signup board
- Las Vegas Metro Police – Declaration of Arrest (Blacked Out)
- Photo Evidence – Robert Moos (Back of Head, No Facial Injuries)
- Photo Evidence – Robert Moos (Back of Head, Close-Up With Stitches)
Each document and image included here is public evidence of a criminal legal system operating as a mafia-style monopoly. From tampering with evidence to deliberately manufacturing falsehoods, the entire process—police, prosecutors, judges, and defenders—appears designed to profit from wrongful convictions. Is our legal system capable of becoming an NAZI system?
