Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney
Statement from Russell Martin / Plaintiff / District Court Lawsuit
If you get Judge Tara Clark Newberry as a judge or attorney run away refuse her public or private services in court or out of court.
Shielding Corruption Under The4thReich
The4thReich lives in the courtroom. Judge Tara Clark Newberry demonstrated her allegiance to that system when she obstructed justice under the cover of “judicial immunity”—a doctrine increasingly used to protect corrupt public servants rather than uphold the Constitution. Her decision to dismantle my lawsuit was not based on law, fairness, or truth. Instead, it was clearly designed to protect powerful actors: retired officer Robert Moos, Las Vegas Athletic Club (LVAC), the police, and the legal system at large.
Judges today often use their, positional authority, political alignment or following he business model of The4thReich to interpret laws in ways that serve deception and injustice. In my case, the legal system constructed false evidence, suppressed critical bodycam footage, and manipulated court procedures—all to manufacture power and control over a law-abiding citizen. When courts like the U.S. Superior Court or Nevada Superior Court make decisions in one case, those rulings are often misused as tools of justification in other cases. Judges, eager to align with the business model or political structure of The4thReich, apply these precedents selectively. This weaponization of precedent and case law forms a covert legal justification strategy, empowering judges to block access to jury trials and control outcomes without public oversight.
No Jury Trial – The Backbone of Justice?
This is precisely why I have been repeatedly denied a jury trial in both District Court and Civil Court. The Constitution guarantees that right. However, in today’s corrupt legal landscape, that right is deliberately withheld to prevent truth from entering public view.
In addition, I discovered that although I could research the Nevada State Laws, I could not freely access court case records unless I paid for a private legal database. This, too, is part of a business model designed to obstruct justice. When individuals attempt to defend themselves, they are blocked not by law, but by infrastructure engineered to exclude them. Such information should be open and freely accessible—just like the law itself. AI is the beginning of this process. However if a judge blocks, manipulates, obstructs due process or refuses you access to a jury trial you are without constitutional law. A lawless society.
It is not what a Judge says, It is what they are not saying that is important.
This raises a further question: Am I being denied justice simply because I’m defending myself? Judge Michael Villani, Other Judges, Judge Diane Sullivan and Judge Tara Clark Newberry have both engaged in patterns of behavior that suggest exactly that. The system, it seems, protects its income and control above all else. In reality, public defenders and civil attorneys often function as extensions of the very system they are supposed to challenge.
My lawsuit detailed multiple claims, including:
- False arrest and fabricated witness statements
- A physical attack by retired officer Robert Moos
- LVAC’s failure to document or report the incident
- Claims against police, prosecutors, and judges for misconduct
Judicial Immunity The Tool To Resolve All Public Corruption
Yet Judge Tara Clark Newberry invoked judicial immunity to dismiss all claims involving public servants, regardless of the evidence presented. Moreover, she used legal technicalities, procedural jargon, and cherry-picked case law to shut down other claims—a clear act of judicial activism aligned with the goals of The4thReich. Ultimately, her objective was to prevent me from receiving a jury trial and silence my efforts to expose systemic corruption.
Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney
A Legal System with No Compass
Today in Nevada, the justice system no longer serves the people. Las Vegas police officers, sheriffs, attorneys, judges, district attorneys, and even the attorney general have lost their moral compass. Their loyalty is no longer to the Constitution—it is to a self-sustaining power structure driven by income, immunity, and institutional loyalty. What they defend is not justice—it is a monopoly on power. And what they destroy are the rights and futures of citizens like me.
Why LivRight?
You must grasp the purpose of LivRight. The legal system today functions as a criminal monopoly. Every tool it gives you is a trap, designed to manipulate, isolate, and finally, force a guilty plea. You do not yet understand how deep the deception goes. But AI does. That’s why LivRight exists.
Watch the LivRight AI video disclosure and discover the laws that were designed to protect you—but are now hidden behind courtroom theatrics and judicial arrogance. Without LivRight, your life can spiral out of control, just like mine did. For two years, I believed the lie that justice was possible through the system. I was wrong. The individuals exposed on LivRight are not the exception—they are the norm.
People Go To Jail For Crimes They Did Not Commit.
These people will put you in prison for life—not for justice, but for power, profit, and political promotion. They thrive on fear, feed off ignorance, and weaponize your trust. The system is progressive the same as what happened in WW2 when the police became NAZI’s . The system is maturing into The4thReich. Their success depends on your silence.
So fight back. Get educated fast. Build your defense with AI. If your attorney won’t follow orders, fire them. Record everything. Publish the truth. List their name on LivRight. Then, connect with real leaders—wherever they are in the world.
Because your freedom depends on action, not permission.
A Warning to All Defendants / Plaintiffs
USE AI To Discover What Your Attorney and judge Is NOT DOING.
Be cautious with any attorney appointed to you or you are paying for his services. Develop your own legal plan. If your attorney refuses to follow your strategy or blocks your access to justice, discharge them immediately and find one who will fight for you per AI instructions.
Russell Martin
Legal Watch: Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney – Las Vegas, NV
“Justice is not a commodity. It’s a right.”
🔍 LivRIGHT Public Servant Profile: Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney
Name: Tara Clark Newberry
Position: Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court – Clark County, Nevada
Legal Context: Named through public statement in association with Case No. 25-CV-636-APG-BNW
Status: Accused of obstructing civil justice, suppressing jury rights, and protecting corrupt officials through judicial immunity
Allegations: Judicial activism, misuse of precedent, denial of access to trial, and willful suppression of constitutional claims
⚖️ Summary of Alleged Misconduct:
Judge Tara Clark Newberry is accused of abusing the legal shield of judicial immunity to dismiss legitimate claims brought by Plaintiff Russell Martin. These claims included allegations of:
A false arrest supported by fabricated police reports
Withheld and tampered bodycam evidence
Physical assault by retired officer Robert Moos
LVAC’s failure to file a legally mandated incident report
Participation by public servants in racketeering and civil rights violations
Rather than allow these claims to proceed to a jury, Judge Newberry allegedly used procedural manipulation and selective legal interpretation to obstruct all avenues of justice. According to the Plaintiff, her decisions reflect not judicial impartiality—but a deliberate alignment with a legal culture designed to protect government insiders while silencing public accountability.
🚨 Legal and Constitutional Violations:
Federal Violations
42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Dismissal of civil rights claims without hearing
18 U.S.C. § 1503 – Obstruction of justice through misuse of judicial authority
18 U.S.C. § 1962 (RICO) – Alleged complicity in protecting enterprise actors under state cover
Sixth Amendment – Obstruction of Plaintiff’s right to a jury trial
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments – Due process denial and unequal application of the law
Judicial Conduct Violations
Canon 1 – Failure to uphold judicial independence and integrity
Canon 2A – Eroding public confidence by acting as an institutional protector
Canon 3B(5) – Demonstrating bias through selective application of precedent
Canon 3C(1) – Failing to recuse in matters involving public corruption or institutional conflict
🧨 Alleged Role in The4thReich Judiciary:
According to Plaintiff testimony, Judge Newberry did not simply apply judicial doctrine—she weaponized legal language and used procedural rulings to silence claims of misconduct by law enforcement, legal professionals, and other state actors. Her refusal to allow these claims to be heard by a jury is framed not as neutrality, but as an act of allegiance to a judicial-political enterprise identified as The4thReich.
The pattern is familiar: use judicial immunity to protect allies, reinterpret state policy decisions as broad legal shields, and suppress whistleblowers by denying them access to trial. Her courtroom, in this account, functioned not as a venue for truth—but as a firewall against liability for the powerful.
💥 Harm to Plaintiff:
Dismissal of legitimate civil claims
Suppression of access to jury trial
Emotional and financial stress due to denial of due process
Legal obstruction protecting violent actors and unethical professionals
Erosion of public confidence in judicial fairness
📣 Recommended Accountability:
1. Formal Complaint to Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline
Include documented dismissal of civil rights claims
Challenge use of judicial immunity to shield institutional corruption
2. Referral to DOJ Civil Rights Division
For enabling state-level enterprise activity that suppresses federally protected rights
Highlight refusal to grant jury access and use of selective precedent
3. LivRIGHT Public Disclosure
Publish a full profile in the Corrupt Judiciary Database
Archive legal motions, dismissals, and procedural anomalies
📰 LivRIGHT Statement Template:
Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney: Judicial Immunity as a Shield for Corruption
When Russell Martin brought forward detailed claims of police misconduct, false arrests, and suppressed evidence, he expected the truth to be heard in court. Instead, Judge Tara Clark Newberry used the shield of judicial immunity to block every avenue of justice. Her rulings didn’t reflect fairness—they reflected fear. Fear of what a public trial might expose. Fear of who might be held accountable. By aligning herself with the interests of a corrupt legal system and suppressing the voice of the accused, Judge Newberry became not a servant of justice—but an agent of The4thReich. LivRIGHT calls for her exposure, accountability, and immediate review.
Alleged Violations and Injustices Committed by Judge Tara Clark Newberry attorney in the Case of Russell Martin
Misuse of Judicial Immunity
Immediately invoked judicial immunity to dismiss all claims against public servants, regardless of evidence showing misconduct, thereby shielding government actors from accountability.Failure to Acknowledge Ongoing Criminal Proceedings
Ignored the fact that Mr. Martin’s District Court case remained unresolved, and that any financial assessments or civil dismissals were premature and legally invalid under both federal and state due process laws.Preemptively Discharging Active Claims
Dismissed civil allegations despite pending criminal resolution, violating the principle that financial penalties or judgments must not proceed until a defendant is found guilty or not guilty.Suppressing Evidence of Prosecutorial Misconduct
Refused to examine the documented criminal conduct of prosecutors, including coercion, false filings, and suppression of exculpatory material—thereby obstructing justice.Blocking Access to Jury Trial
Denied Mr. Martin his constitutional right to a jury trial in civil court, consistent with a broader judicial pattern designed to keep public corruption from public view.Disregarding False Arrest Documentation
Failed to investigate or permit inquiry into the fraudulent arrest report used to initiate prosecution, despite clear inconsistencies and contrary witness testimony.Sanctioning Procedural Abuse by State Defense Team
Accepted legal arguments from the State’s defense that contradicted due process, including claims that liability could not be determined until conviction—yet still ruled to dismiss.Refusing to Hold Public Officials Accountable
Systematically rejected all legal pathways to investigate or charge public officials, including police, judges, and prosecutors, reinforcing a double standard in justice.Aligning Judicial Strategy with The4thReich Legal Model
Displayed patterns of behavior that reflect allegiance to a political-judicial structure—what Plaintiff identifies as The4thReich—where public immunity, secrecy, and power override the Constitution.Undermining Plaintiff’s Right to Fair Adjudication
Used selective precedent, inaccessible legal reasoning, and judicial overreach to derail a legitimate lawsuit brought by a self-represented citizen seeking relief from systemic abuse.
Charges Reduced to Misdemeanor
After years of resisting a coerced plea, charges were finally reduced to a misdemeanor. If critical evidence—like police video and eyewitness statements—had been disclosed earlier, this case would have been resolved in months, not years. Moreover, the truth would have exposed Chris Adamson’s vital testimony from the start. There is more evidence as to the corruption of the system. I will load over time.
Available Records Include:
Gabriel Villanueva – Manifested Embellished Arrest Report- Gabriel Villanueva – Manifested Embellished Arrest Report Blacked Out.
- Chris Adamson – False Witness Statement Created by Jake Gullo
- Ken Sole – False Witness Statement Created by Jake Gullo
- Robert Moos Declaration to Reinstate Club Membership. Shows pictures of signup board
- Las Vegas Metro Police – Declaration of Arrest (Blacked Out)
- Photo Evidence – Robert Moos (Back of Head, No Facial Injuries)
- Photo Evidence – Robert Moos (Back of Head, Close-Up With Stitches)
For More information Search Russell Martin Plaintiff
The4thReich is the business model of the legal system and image included here is public evidence of a criminal legal system operating as a mafia-style monopoly. From tampering with evidence to deliberately manufacturing falsehoods, the entire process—police, prosecutors, judges, and defenders—appears designed to profit from wrongful convictions. Is our legal system capable of becoming an NAZI 4thReich system?
