Steven Wolfson District Attorney – Las Vegas NV or “NAZI SS”?

russmartin1June 6, 20250226 views

Steven Wolfson District Attorney Las Vegas - Controller of the NAZI Regional Justice Center

Steven Wolfson District Attorney Las Vegas NV

Statement from Russell Martin

Treason In Nevada

Leader of a Broken Corrupt System of Justice for Profit.

I submitted documented evidence of criminal misconduct to Steven Wolfson when I did not know he was one of the leaders of the business model.

Steven Wolfson District Attorney has become a central figure in the rise of a modern legal regime that mirrors the tactics WW2 Third Reich NAZI Syestem. As District Attorney, he has abandoned all moral compass, trading justice for power, control, and profit. Wolfson knew that the arrest report against Russell Martin—alleging felony assault with a deadly weapon on an elderly person—was a false claim. Yet he gave active leadership to police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and Judge Diane Sullivan to obstruct justice and deny me due process of law.

Wolfson enables a system that relies on false witness statements, tampered police videos, and hidden evidence. His strategy is clear: overwhelm innocent defendants with inflated charges and pressure them into plea deals by making justice unaffordable and time consuming to distroy the income of the defendant. Had Martin taken this path to trial, the cost would exceed $20,000 to $100,000.

Steven Wolfson District Attorney or NAZI?

LivRight identifies Steven Wolfson as a key enabler of The4thReich legal model and demands his immediate removal from public office.

Why LivRight?

You must grasp the purpose of LivRight. The legal system today functions as a criminal monopoly. Every tool it gives you is a trap, designed to manipulate, isolate, and finally, force a guilty plea. You do not yet understand how deep the deception goes. But AI does. That’s why LivRight exists.

Watch the LivRight AI video disclosure and discover the laws that were designed to protect you—but are now hidden behind courtroom theatrics and judicial arrogance. Without LivRight, your life can spiral out of control, just like mine did. For two years, I believed the lie that justice was possible through the system. I was wrong. The individuals exposed on LivRight are not the exception—they are the norm.

People Go To Jail For Crimes They Did Not Commit.

These people will put you in prison for life—not for justice, but for power, profit, and political promotion. They thrive on fear, feed off ignorance, and weaponize your trust. The system is progressive the same as what happened in WW2 when the police became NAZI’s . The system is maturing into The4thReich. Their success depends on your silence.

So fight back. Get educated fast. Build your defense with AI. If your attorney won’t follow orders, fire them. Record everything. Publish the truth. List their name on LivRight. Then, connect with real leaders—wherever they are in the world.

Because your freedom depends on action, not permission.

A Warning to All Defendants / Plaintiffs

USE AI To Discover What Your Attorney and judge Is NOT DOING.

Be cautious with any attorney appointed to you or you are paying for his services. Develop your own legal plan. If your attorney refuses to follow your strategy or blocks your access to justice, discharge them immediately and find one who will fight for you per AI instructions.

Russell Martin

Legal Watch: Steven Wolfson District Attorney Las Vegas

“Justice is not a commodity. It’s a right.”

🔍 LivRIGHT AI Legal Response:

AI Legal Response: The Duties and Legal Accountability of District Attorney Steven Wolfson, Las Vegas, Nevada

The District Attorney (DA) is the highest-ranking public prosecutor within the county and is constitutionally and ethically required to act as a minister of justice, not merely a legal opponent. When evidence arises that prosecutors, law enforcement, or associated legal actors are committing or enabling fraudulent prosecution, falsified evidence, or civil rights violations, the DA bears direct legal responsibility to intervene and correct it.

1. Duty to Seek Justice – Not Convictions

Under both ABA Rule 3.8 and Nevada legal ethics, the District Attorney has an obligation to ensure the accused receives a fair trial and that wrongful prosecutions are avoided. This duty supersedes any goal of winning a conviction. If Steven Wolfson knows or should have known that a felony arrest report was falsified, or that evidence was withheld or altered, he must dismiss the charges immediately and discipline those responsible.

2. Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence (Brady Obligation)

Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), a prosecutor is legally required to disclose all evidence favorable to the defense. If Steven Wolfson permitted police to withhold bodycam footage, tamper with videos, or fabricate documents—and failed to disclose this to the defendant—he violated constitutional law and is liable for prosecutorial misconduct.

3. Prohibition Against Using False Testimony or Evidence

The use of known false witness statements, misleading documentation, or altered digital media constitutes fraud upon the court and violates both federal and state law, including:

42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Civil rights violations under color of law
18 U.S.C. § 242 – Deprivation of rights
Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct – Rule 8.4 (Misconduct)

If Steven Wolfson allowed or directed the use of falsified police reports or coached witnesses to lie, he is personally responsible for obstruction of justice and misconduct in public office.

4. Liability for Financial Coercion Through Legal Threat

If the DA’s office knowingly inflates charges to coerce plea deals—forcing defendants like Russell Martin to choose between financial ruin or false guilt—this constitutes economic duress and violates the principle of substantive due process. Prosecutors cannot use the threat of excessive legal costs to override innocence or deny fair trial rights.

Conclusion

If District Attorney Steven Wolfson has knowledge of falsified arrest records, tampered evidence, and coordinated legal obstruction—and continues to pursue prosecution—he is violating his constitutional duties, committing prosecutorial misconduct, and may be civilly and criminally liable under state and federal law.

LivRight calls for legal review, removal from office, and potential criminal investigation into his conduct. The duty of a prosecutor is to uphold the law—not to weaponize it.

Carl Arnold Is Guilty of the Following Chargeable Offenses:

Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Russell Martin
As appointed defense counsel, Carl Arnold had a legal obligation to act solely in the interest of his client. By abandoning communication, disregarding motions, and failing to follow through on promised actions, he violated this fundamental duty of loyalty and care.
Stonewalling Court Proceedings
Arnold actively delayed or obstructed progress in Mr. Martin’s case by failing to file critical motions, ignoring direct inquiries, and avoiding procedural follow-up. This inaction directly contributed to prolonged exposure to unjust prosecution.
Refusing to Investigate the False Arrest Report
Despite having access to evidence contradicting the claims made in the police report, Arnold refused to challenge or investigate the legitimacy of the charges, allowing fabricated allegations to remain unopposed.

Failing to Suppress The Judge to Obey The Constitution of the United States.

Concealing Robert Moos’s Status as a Retired Police Chief
Carl Arnold allegedly withheld material information about the assailant’s law enforcement background, which could have shown bias in arrest and prosecution decisions and revealed systemic protectionism.
Withholding Bodycam Footage and Photographic Evidence
Although body camera footage and photographs were essential to Mr. Martin’s defense, Arnold failed to demand their production or disclose their contents, thus suppressing potentially exonerating evidence.
Failing to Inform the Court That Mr. Martin Never Struck Robert Moos
Arnold neglected to present a basic factual defense: that the Plaintiff never made physical contact with the alleged victim. This omission materially weakened Mr. Martin’s position and violated fundamental trial obligations.

Refusing to obey fundamentals of Due Process of Law

Refusing to Confront False and Manifested Witness Statements Rather than object to or challenge fraudulent testimonies, Arnold allowed false witness statements to enter the court record without opposition—effectively aiding the prosecution’s false narrative.
Allowing the Use of Manufactured Testimony Containing Multiple False Claims
Two witness statements, each containing demonstrable fabrications, were permitted to proceed under Arnold’s watch, with no motion filed to exclude or investigate them.
Colluding with Judges to Pressure a Guilty Plea
Arnold participated in off-record bench meetings with prosecutors and judges, after which the trajectory of the case shifted. These meetings and subsequent non-action suggest coordination intended to coerce Mr. Martin into a guilty plea, rather than pursuing acquittal.

Available Records Include:

Each document and image included here is public evidence of a criminal legal system operating as a mafia-style monopoly. From tampering with evidence to deliberately manufacturing falsehoods, the entire process—police, prosecutors, judges, and defenders—appears designed to profit from wrongful convictions. Is our legal system capable of becoming an NAZI system?