Robert Moos Retired Police Professional / LVAC

⚖️ Summary of Alleged Misconduct:

Moos, a retired police officer,  initiated a premeditated physical attack on Plaintiff Russell Martin, escalating a racquetball game disagreement into a felony-level assault with intent to kill. After striking Martin on the head with a racquet manipulated like a weapon, Moos used his law enforcement training and connections to orchestrate a false narrative—transforming himself from the aggressor into the alleged victim. Moos’s actions and subsequent perjury set in motion a multi-year legal persecution of an innocent manRussell Complaint (10).

🚨 Violated Laws and Legal Principles:

Federal Criminal Allegations

• 18 U.S.C. § 1951 – Hobbs Act: Engaged in extortion via false claims and financial coercion

• 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968 – RICO Act: Participated in a pattern of racketeering to avoid prosecution and secure $10,000 judgmentRussell Complaint (10)

• 18 U.S.C. § 1621 – Perjury: Lied under oath in police reports, depositions, and civil proceedingsRussell Complaint (10)

• 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512–1515 – Obstruction and Witness Tampering: Misled the court to derail justiceRussell Complaint (10)

Constitutional Violations

• Fourth Amendment: Caused unlawful seizure based on fabricated events

• Fourteenth Amendment: Denied Plaintiff due process by colluding with law enforcement to frame him

• 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Engaged in civil rights violations under color of lawRussell Complaint (10)

💥 Specific Criminal and Civil Acts:

• Premeditated Attempted Murder: Rotated a racquet to “hatchet” position and struck Plaintiff’s head with lethal intentRussell Complaint (10)

• Fraudulent Misrepresentation: Lied in multiple legal venues to conceal guiltRussell Complaint (10)

• Malicious Prosecution: Triggered a 4-year legal battle by fabricating victim statusRussell Complaint (10)

• Abuse of Process: Filed restraining orders and small claims suits to maintain a false narrativeRussell Complaint (10)

• Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Repeated bullying, lying, and manipulation over several yearsRussell Complaint (10)

🧠 Premeditation and Training:

Moos weaponized his law enforcement background:

• Knew how to control a narrative

• Anticipated legal system protection under the “Blue Wall of Silence”

• Refused court orders and dodged subpoenas

• Used LVAC and legal actors to maintain the illusion that Plaintiff was the aggressor

Despite notarized witness statements disproving Moos’s claims, Clark County judges, prosecutors, and officers refused to investigate or arrest him. Moos continued his misinformation campaign even while ignoring court mandatesRussell Complaint (10)Russell Complaint (10).

📉 Damages to Plaintiff:

• Lost businesses (GYMStarPro, StarSEO)

• $10,000 civil judgment obtained by fraud

• Lost ability to fund daughter’s Ivy League education

• Physical and psychological trauma

• Forced self-representation after attorneys refused support

• Four years of blocked legal and economic opportunitiesRussell Complaint (10)

📣 Recommended Disciplinary and Legal Action:

1. Criminal Referral

• DOJ and Attorney General investigation for:

  • Attempted murder

  • Obstruction

  • Perjury

  • Civil rights violations

2. Public Disclosure

• LivRIGHT database inclusion

• Notification to police oversight boards and LVAC legal counsel

3. Civil Suit Continuation

• Plaintiff seeks:

  • $500,000+ compensatory damages

  • Treble damages under RICO

  • Public retraction

  • Full dismissal of fraudulent claims and liens