Judges Las Vegas Lawyers NAZI Nevada Public Servant United States Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney Las Vegas or NAZI SS? russmartin1June 3, 20250717 views Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney if you get this person as an attorney or judge run don't walk. Judge Tara Clark Newberry AttorneyStatement from Russell Martin / Plaintiff / District Court LawsuitTreason In NevadaIf you get Judge Tara Clark Newberry as a judge or attorney run away refuse her public or private services in court or out of court.Shielding Corruption Under The4thReichThe4thReich lives in the courtroom. Judge Tara Clark Newberry demonstrated her allegiance to that system when she obstructed justice under the cover of “judicial immunity”—a doctrine increasingly used to protect corrupt public servants rather than uphold the Constitution. Her decision to dismantle my lawsuit was not based on law, fairness, or truth. Instead, it was clearly designed to protect powerful actors: retired officer Robert Moos, Las Vegas Athletic Club (LVAC), the police, and the legal system at large.Judges today often use their, positional authority, political alignment or following he business model of The4thReich to interpret laws in ways that serve deception and injustice. In my case, the legal system constructed false evidence, suppressed critical bodycam footage, and manipulated court procedures—all to manufacture power and control over a law-abiding citizen. When courts like the U.S. Superior Court or Nevada Superior Court make decisions in one case, those rulings are often misused as tools of justification in other cases. Judges, eager to align with the business model or political structure of The4thReich, apply these precedents selectively. This weaponization of precedent and case law forms a covert legal justification strategy, empowering judges to block access to jury trials and control outcomes without public oversight.No Jury Trial – The Backbone of Justice?This is precisely why I have been repeatedly denied a jury trial in both District Court and Civil Court. The Constitution guarantees that right. However, in today’s corrupt legal landscape, that right is deliberately withheld to prevent truth from entering public view.In addition, I discovered that although I could research the Nevada State Laws, I could not freely access court case records unless I paid for a private legal database. This, too, is part of a business model designed to obstruct justice. When individuals attempt to defend themselves, they are blocked not by law, but by infrastructure engineered to exclude them. Such information should be open and freely accessible—just like the law itself. AI is the beginning of this process. However if a judge blocks, manipulates, obstructs due process or refuses you access to a jury trial you are without constitutional law. A lawless society.It is not what a Judge says, It is what they are not saying that is important.This raises a further question: Am I being denied justice simply because I’m defending myself? Judge Michael Villani, Other Judges, Judge Diane Sullivan and Judge Tara Clark Newberry have both engaged in patterns of behavior that suggest exactly that. The system, it seems, protects its income and control above all else. In reality, public defenders and civil attorneys often function as extensions of the very system they are supposed to challenge.My lawsuit detailed multiple claims, including:False arrest and fabricated witness statementsA physical attack by retired officer Robert MoosLVAC’s failure to document or report the incidentClaims against police, prosecutors, and judges for misconductJudicial Immunity The Tool To Resolve All Public CorruptionYet Judge Tara Clark Newberry invoked judicial immunity to dismiss all claims involving public servants, regardless of the evidence presented. Moreover, she used legal technicalities, procedural jargon, and cherry-picked case law to shut down other claims—a clear act of judicial activism aligned with the goals of The4thReich. Ultimately, her objective was to prevent me from receiving a jury trial and silence my efforts to expose systemic corruption.Judge Tara Clark Newberry AttorneyA Legal System with No CompassToday in Nevada, the justice system no longer serves the people. Las Vegas police officers, sheriffs, attorneys, judges, district attorneys, and even the attorney general have lost their moral compass. Their loyalty is no longer to the Constitution—it is to a self-sustaining power structure driven by income, immunity, and institutional loyalty. What they defend is not justice—it is a monopoly on power. And what they destroy are the rights and futures of citizens like me.Why LivRight?You must grasp the purpose of LivRight. The legal system today functions as a criminal monopoly. Every tool it gives you is a trap, designed to manipulate, isolate, and finally, force a guilty plea. You do not yet understand how deep the deception goes. But AI does. That’s why LivRight exists.Watch the LivRight AI video disclosure and discover the laws that were designed to protect you—but are now hidden behind courtroom theatrics and judicial arrogance. Without LivRight, your life can spiral out of control, just like mine did. For two years, I believed the lie that justice was possible through the system. I was wrong. The individuals exposed on LivRight are not the exception—they are the norm.People Go To Jail For Crimes They Did Not Commit.These people will put you in prison for life—not for justice, but for power, profit, and political promotion. They thrive on fear, feed off ignorance, and weaponize your trust. The system is progressive the same as what happened in WW2 when the police became NAZI’s . The system is maturing into The4thReich. Their success depends on your silence.So fight back. Get educated fast. Build your defense with AI. If your attorney won’t follow orders, fire them. Record everything. Publish the truth. List their name on LivRight. Then, connect with real leaders—wherever they are in the world.Because your freedom depends on action, not permission. A Warning to All Defendants / PlaintiffsUSE AI To Discover What Your Attorney and judge Is NOT DOING.Be cautious with any attorney appointed to you or you are paying for his services. Develop your own legal plan. If your attorney refuses to follow your strategy or blocks your access to justice, discharge them immediately and find one who will fight for you per AI instructions. Russell Martin AI Responce Public Recorded Court Documents Legal Watch: Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney – Las Vegas, NV“Justice is not a commodity. It’s a right.”🔍 LivRIGHT Public Servant Profile: Judge Tara Clark Newberry AttorneyName: Tara Clark NewberryPosition: Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court – Clark County, NevadaLegal Context: Named through public statement in association with Case No. 25-CV-636-APG-BNWStatus: Accused of obstructing civil justice, suppressing jury rights, and protecting corrupt officials through judicial immunityAllegations: Judicial activism, misuse of precedent, denial of access to trial, and willful suppression of constitutional claims⚖️ Summary of Alleged Misconduct:Judge Tara Clark Newberry is accused of abusing the legal shield of judicial immunity to dismiss legitimate claims brought by Plaintiff Russell Martin. These claims included allegations of:A false arrest supported by fabricated police reportsWithheld and tampered bodycam evidencePhysical assault by retired officer Robert MoosLVAC’s failure to file a legally mandated incident reportParticipation by public servants in racketeering and civil rights violationsRather than allow these claims to proceed to a jury, Judge Newberry allegedly used procedural manipulation and selective legal interpretation to obstruct all avenues of justice. According to the Plaintiff, her decisions reflect not judicial impartiality—but a deliberate alignment with a legal culture designed to protect government insiders while silencing public accountability.🚨 Legal and Constitutional Violations:Federal Violations42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Dismissal of civil rights claims without hearing18 U.S.C. § 1503 – Obstruction of justice through misuse of judicial authority18 U.S.C. § 1962 (RICO) – Alleged complicity in protecting enterprise actors under state coverSixth Amendment – Obstruction of Plaintiff’s right to a jury trialFifth and Fourteenth Amendments – Due process denial and unequal application of the lawJudicial Conduct ViolationsCanon 1 – Failure to uphold judicial independence and integrityCanon 2A – Eroding public confidence by acting as an institutional protectorCanon 3B(5) – Demonstrating bias through selective application of precedentCanon 3C(1) – Failing to recuse in matters involving public corruption or institutional conflict🧨 Alleged Role in The4thReich Judiciary:According to Plaintiff testimony, Judge Newberry did not simply apply judicial doctrine—she weaponized legal language and used procedural rulings to silence claims of misconduct by law enforcement, legal professionals, and other state actors. Her refusal to allow these claims to be heard by a jury is framed not as neutrality, but as an act of allegiance to a judicial-political enterprise identified as The4thReich.The pattern is familiar: use judicial immunity to protect allies, reinterpret state policy decisions as broad legal shields, and suppress whistleblowers by denying them access to trial. Her courtroom, in this account, functioned not as a venue for truth—but as a firewall against liability for the powerful.💥 Harm to Plaintiff:Dismissal of legitimate civil claimsSuppression of access to jury trialEmotional and financial stress due to denial of due processLegal obstruction protecting violent actors and unethical professionalsErosion of public confidence in judicial fairness📣 Recommended Accountability:1. Formal Complaint to Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineInclude documented dismissal of civil rights claimsChallenge use of judicial immunity to shield institutional corruption2. Referral to DOJ Civil Rights DivisionFor enabling state-level enterprise activity that suppresses federally protected rightsHighlight refusal to grant jury access and use of selective precedent3. LivRIGHT Public DisclosurePublish a full profile in the Corrupt Judiciary DatabaseArchive legal motions, dismissals, and procedural anomalies📰 LivRIGHT Statement Template:Judge Tara Clark Newberry Attorney: Judicial Immunity as a Shield for CorruptionWhen Russell Martin brought forward detailed claims of police misconduct, false arrests, and suppressed evidence, he expected the truth to be heard in court. Instead, Judge Tara Clark Newberry used the shield of judicial immunity to block every avenue of justice. Her rulings didn’t reflect fairness—they reflected fear. Fear of what a public trial might expose. Fear of who might be held accountable. By aligning herself with the interests of a corrupt legal system and suppressing the voice of the accused, Judge Newberry became not a servant of justice—but an agent of The4thReich. LivRIGHT calls for her exposure, accountability, and immediate review. Alleged Violations and Injustices Committed by Judge Tara Clark Newberry attorney in the Case of Russell MartinMisuse of Judicial ImmunityImmediately invoked judicial immunity to dismiss all claims against public servants, regardless of evidence showing misconduct, thereby shielding government actors from accountability.Failure to Acknowledge Ongoing Criminal ProceedingsIgnored the fact that Mr. Martin’s District Court case remained unresolved, and that any financial assessments or civil dismissals were premature and legally invalid under both federal and state due process laws.Preemptively Discharging Active ClaimsDismissed civil allegations despite pending criminal resolution, violating the principle that financial penalties or judgments must not proceed until a defendant is found guilty or not guilty.Suppressing Evidence of Prosecutorial MisconductRefused to examine the documented criminal conduct of prosecutors, including coercion, false filings, and suppression of exculpatory material—thereby obstructing justice.Blocking Access to Jury TrialDenied Mr. Martin his constitutional right to a jury trial in civil court, consistent with a broader judicial pattern designed to keep public corruption from public view.Disregarding False Arrest DocumentationFailed to investigate or permit inquiry into the fraudulent arrest report used to initiate prosecution, despite clear inconsistencies and contrary witness testimony.Sanctioning Procedural Abuse by State Defense TeamAccepted legal arguments from the State’s defense that contradicted due process, including claims that liability could not be determined until conviction—yet still ruled to dismiss.Refusing to Hold Public Officials AccountableSystematically rejected all legal pathways to investigate or charge public officials, including police, judges, and prosecutors, reinforcing a double standard in justice.Aligning Judicial Strategy with The4thReich Legal ModelDisplayed patterns of behavior that reflect allegiance to a political-judicial structure—what Plaintiff identifies as The4thReich—where public immunity, secrecy, and power override the Constitution.Undermining Plaintiff’s Right to Fair AdjudicationUsed selective precedent, inaccessible legal reasoning, and judicial overreach to derail a legitimate lawsuit brought by a self-represented citizen seeking relief from systemic abuse.Charges Reduced to MisdemeanorAfter years of resisting a coerced plea, charges were finally reduced to a misdemeanor. If critical evidence—like police video and eyewitness statements—had been disclosed earlier, this case would have been resolved in months, not years. Moreover, the truth would have exposed Chris Adamson’s vital testimony from the start. There is more evidence as to the corruption of the system. I will load over time. Available Records Include: Gabriel Villanueva – Manifested Embellished Arrest Report Gabriel Villanueva – Manifested Embellished Arrest Report Blacked Out. Chris Adamson – False Witness Statement Created by Jake Gullo Ken Sole – False Witness Statement Created by Jake Gullo Chris Adamson – True, Notarized Witness Testimony Monday Night Attack by Robert Moos (Retired Police Chief) Robert Moos Declaration to Reinstate Club Membership. Shows pictures of signup board Small Claims Public Court Transcript – Judge Eric Goodman Formal Complaint – Judge Eric Goodman (Small Claims) Las Vegas Metro Police – Declaration of Arrest (Unredacted) Las Vegas Metro Police – Declaration of Arrest (Blacked Out) Official Charges – Las Vegas Metro Arrest Document First Arrest Report – Officer A.J. Pollock Photo Evidence – Robert Moos (Back of Head, No Facial Injuries) Photo Evidence – Robert Moos (Back of Head, Close-Up With Stitches) Lawsuit Filed – Jake Gullo & Multiple Public OfficialsFor More information Search Russell Martin PlaintiffThe4thReich is the business model of the legal system and image included here is public evidence of a criminal legal system operating as a mafia-style monopoly. From tampering with evidence to deliberately manufacturing falsehoods, the entire process—police, prosecutors, judges, and defenders—appears designed to profit from wrongful convictions. Is our legal system capable of becoming an NAZI 4thReich system?