Jake Gullo Attorney – Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV or NAZI?

Jake Gullo Attorney Las Vegas - Do you want this attorney as your legal counsel, Check LivRight before you lean the hard way.

Statement from Russell Martin

If you are assigned or considering Jake Gullo as a lawyer—walk away. Fast.

Jake Gullo wasn’t just ineffective—he led a coordinated effort to pressure me into a guilty plea using false evidence he manufactered. He violated every duty a defense attorney owes to their client.

Instead of defending me, he acted as a state operative, arranging false witness statements and using intimidation tactics—all while wearing the mask of legal counsel.

He should have been disbarred. But under Nevada’s corrupt legal monopoly, Judicial Immunity protects him and others like him, even when they act with criminal intent.

This system isn’t justice—it’s a business built on destruction, and lawyers like Gullo are the dealers of false confessions.

If you trust Jake Gullo with your defense—or your life—you may lose both.

Russell Martin

Be A Patriot

Vote To Control Government Public Servants

World Justice League

Where Truth Confronts Corruption


Legal Watch: Jake Gullo, Attorney – Las Vegas, NV

“Justice is not a commodity. It’s a right.”

Jake Gullo attorney, a public defender in Las Vegas, has abandoned his oath and aligned with a corrupt legal framework that resembles a Fourth Reich-style regime. While once tasked with defending the innocent, he now functions as a coercive agent of a state-sanctioned racket.

Despite knowing that Russell Martin’s felony arrest report was entirely fabricated, Gullo pushed forward with prosecution. Furthermore when Judge Tara Clarkson dismissed these actions under judicial immunity, it exposed the system’s deeper intent—not justice, but control through corruption.

Highlights:

  • Fabricated arrest report knowingly used

  • False witness statements submitted

  • Evidence of extortion and racketeering

  • Key facts (e.g., “victim” was retired police) intentionally hidden

  • Judge protected systemic abuse through judicial immunity


Understanding Judicial Immunity:

“Not in the Constitution. Not in the people’s interest.”

Judicial immunity in Nevada is a state-level legal shield—not a federal constitutional principle. It allows public servants to act above the law, often with criminal intent, while hiding behind institutional protection.

This immunity has become a weapon, enabling:

  • Unpunished misconduct

  • Suppression of evidence

  • Intimidation of defendants

  • State-sponsored legal racketeering


Conclusion: This Is Not Malpractice. It Is Machine-Driven Corruption.

Gullo’s actions were calculated, not careless. He operated as a legal enforcer of extortion, suppressing truth while advancing threats meant to imprison an innocent man. What happened to Russell Martin is not rare—it is a systemic pattern.

“We must call this what it is: Racketeering under the color of law.”


LivRight Mission Statement

At LivRight, we stand to:

  • Restore the Constitution

  • Expose systemic corruption

  • Demand accountability at every level of government

We believe America belongs to its people—not to legal monopolies or corrupt institutions.


Call to Action

[ Report Corruption]
[ Learn Your Rights]
[ Shop Patriot Gear]
[ Support the Lawsuit]

You May Also Need To Know

Wolfe & Wyman LLP

May 4, 2025

Analytical Summary of Alleged Actions of Jake Gullo

  1. Failure to Challenge Alleged False Arrest Report
    If an attorney knowingly proceeds with a case based on a false arrest report, it could raise serious concerns under ethical rules of professional conduct. Attorneys have a duty to zealously represent their clients, which includes investigating claims and challenging falsehoods.

  2. Omission of Relevant Background (e.g., Robert Moos)
    If an attorney ignores or deliberately fails to investigate a key witness’s or complainant’s background, it may constitute a breach of due diligence and duty of competence, as defined by legal ethics.

  3. Use of Judicial Immunity to Shield Misconduct
    While judicial immunity is a real and widely accepted legal doctrine that protects judges from civil suits for actions taken in their official capacity, its misuse or blanket application to shield misconduct could indicate a breakdown in accountability mechanisms.

  4. Implication in a Corrupt System
    If the legal system is being used systematically to extract financial or other benefits from individuals through false charges or coercion, this might fit definitions of racketeering under the RICO Act, or other federal civil rights violations (e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1983).

  5. FACTUAL ALLEGATION – PUBLIC DEFENDER JAKE GULLO ORCHESTRATES COERCED PLEA USING FALSE EVIDENCE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PRESSURE

    On or about [insert date], Jake Gullo, a Clark County public defender assigned to represent Plaintiff Russell Martin, orchestrated a deliberate scheme to coerce and manipulate his own client into pleading guilty to criminal charges by using fabricated evidence and psychological pressure tactics.

    Rather than provide a constitutionally mandated defense, Gullo acted as the primary architect of a plan to deprive the Plaintiff of his rights. Gullo initiated and led a meeting under false pretenses, presenting it as a legal strategy session. In reality, the meeting was a coordinated effort to “brainwash” the Plaintiff into surrendering his constitutional rights and accepting a plea based on false premises.

    Gullo recruited State Investigator Tony Worthman and Attorney Katrina Ross to participate in this meeting. Together, they:

    • Presented false witness statements as legitimate,

    • Misrepresented the strength of the State’s case,

    • Intimidated the Plaintiff with exaggerated or fabricated consequences,

    • And suppressed exculpatory facts and evidence in the Plaintiff’s favor.

    These actions were not the result of poor judgment, but of a calculated conspiracy initiated by the Plaintiff’s own attorney, in violation of:

    • The Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel,

    • The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process,

    • 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for abuse of authority under color of state law,

    • And 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2), for conspiracy to obstruct justice and deny a fair trial.

    Plaintiff is in possession of supporting documentation, including but not limited to:

    • The falsified witness statement(s),

    • Records of the coerced meeting,

    • Legal filings and investigative correspondence that demonstrate collusion initiated by Gullo.

Jake Gullo — Attorney, Public Defender… or NAZI Collaborator?

If you are assigned Jake Gullo as a public defender or lawyer, refuse his services immediately—whether in court or out. This is not legal representation; it is state-sponsored betrayal. LivRight’s mission is to restore the Constitution of the United States and expose corruption throughout the police and legal system.

Learn how LivRight will fight for “We The People” and bring down the systems designed to trap, coerce, and destroy innocent Americans.


📉 1 in 5 Public Defenders Fail Their Fiduciary Duty

Jake Gullo was Russell Martin’s first public defender, assigned after Martin was charged with “Felony Assault With a Deadly Weapon Upon an Elderly Person.” From the beginning, Gullo stated the minimum sentence would be five years—an intimidating claim designed to push for a plea.

However, as ten months passed, Martin saw no real legal advocacy. With COVID lockdowns complicating court access, he turned to the law library to learn his rights. It was there that he discovered Gullo was failing nearly every fiduciary obligation. From that point forward, Martin began documenting the stonewalling and legal negligence.


📋 Demand for Action, Met with Deceit

Determined to build a real defense, Mr. Martin created a list of witness questions for Jake Gullo. He requested interviews with Chris Adamson and Tony (last name redacted) and submitted exact questions.

Shockingly, instead of following through, Gullo fabricated two witness statements—each containing three false claims—to pressure Martin into pleading guilty. That betrayal earned Gullo the name “The Snake” among court watchers.


⚖️ Is Jake Gullo a Defender or a Prosecutor?

This raises a fundamental question: Is your public defender actually working for you—or the state?

In many modern courtrooms, the defense attorney is no longer a shield. Instead, he becomes an accessory to the prosecution, pretending to help while orchestrating your surrender. Meanwhile, the judge is left to rubber-stamp your conviction under the illusion of due process. This isn’t justice. It’s a state-run conviction machine.


🐍 The Snake Revealed: How Jake Gullo Betrayed His Client

Jake Gullo’s actions show a textbook pattern of legal sabotage:

  • Withholding crucial evidence

  • Hiding photos, videos, and documents

  • Refusing to disclose witness information

  • Sequestering his client from direct contact

  • Denying requests for body cam and police image records

Eventually, Mr. Martin discovered that he himself had the phone numbers of the key witnesses. Once he began seeking statements, Gullo, in collaboration with state investigator Tony Worthman, launched a coercive strategy. They manufactured false witness accounts—weaponizing fear to force a guilty plea.


🧾 False Witness Statements as Tools of Extortion

These statements weren’t accidental. They were strategically designed to incriminate Mr. Martin. Gullo and Worthman emphasized the five-year sentence to induce panic and break Martin’s will. That’s not defense—it’s extortion.


🧑‍⚖️ Judge Michael Villani: A Nazi SS in Robes?

Eventually, Martin presented his objections directly to Judge Michael Villani. However, instead of seeking the truth, Villani called Martin a liar and refused to review the facts. This wasn’t justice—it was a setup.

More disturbing, it reflected a wider trend in Nevada’s judicial system. Courtrooms are no longer places of impartial judgment—they’re command centers for authoritarian enforcement. This system operates more like the 4th Reich than a constitutional republic.


🛑 LivRight Demands Accountability

LivRight calls for the immediate resignation of Jake Gullo from all public service roles. Should he refuse, or should officials fail to act, a boycott of Las Vegas and related Nevada institutions will remain in place.

“No justice, no peace. No resignations, no tourism.”


📂 Access the Public Records

[See Court Documents and Transcripts →]

Jake Gullo Is Guilty of the Following Chargeable Offenses:

  • Violating fiduciary duty to Russell Martin

  • Stonewalling court proceedings

  • Refusing to investigate the false arrest report

  • Concealing Robert Moos’s employment as a retired police chief

  • Withholding photos and body camera footage critical to Martin’s small claims case

  • Failing to inform prosecutors and judges that Mr. Martin never struck Robert Moos

  • Refusing to ask key deposition questions

  • Manufacturing two false witness statements containing multiple false claims

  • Colluding with Judge Michael Villani and prosecutors to force a guilty plea.

After years of resisting a coerced plea, charges were finally reduced to a misdemeanor. If critical evidence—like police video and eyewitness statements—had been disclosed earlier, this case would have been resolved in months, not years. Moreover, the truth would have exposed Chris Adamson’s vital testimony from the start.


Available Records Include:

Each document and image included here is public evidence of a criminal legal system operating as a mafia-style monopoly. From tampering with evidence to deliberately manufacturing falsehoods, the entire process—police, prosecutors, judges, and defenders—appears designed to profit from wrongful convictions. Is our legal system capable of becoming an NAZI system?

Related posts

Judge Michael Villani Las Vegas NV Or NAZI?

Tony Worthman Public Investigator Las Vegas or NAZI?

Carolyn Goodman Mayor of Las Vegas or NAZI?