Governor Joe Lombardo of Nevada or “Nazi SS”?

russmartin1June 6, 20250220 views

Governor Joe Lombardo -

Governor Joe Lombardo of Nevada

Statement from Russell Martin

Treason In Nevada

Leader of a Broken Corrupt System of Justice.

Governor Joe Lombardo of Nevada: Leader of The4thReich’s Legal Machine

As a former sheriff turned governor, Lombardo received detailed evidence from Russell Martin regarding systemic criminal behavior by law enforcement, prosecutors, and internal affairs. Despite this, he chose silence. This image calls out Lombardo’s allegiance to a corrupt structure dubbed The4thReich—a network where justice is replaced with control, and cover-ups are policy. Citizens are urged to Boycott Las Vegas and demand resignations at the top.

In America, trust in the Constitution defines our liberty. That trust breaks the moment government leaders weaponize the legal system against their own citizens. Governor Joe Lombardo, far from being a passive observer, has become the central authority figure in Nevada’s growing legal corruption.

Joe Lombardo personally appoints the Attorney General, who then appoints the District Attorneys across Nevada. These figures, under his authority, are responsible for supervising the conduct of judges, prosecutors, and public defenders. Moreover, Lombardo’s influence reaches deep into the oversight agencies meant to uphold justice: Internal Affairs of the Police, the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline, and the Nevada State Bar. Each of these agencies has received documentation of misconduct. None have acted. Their silence is not accidental—it’s coordinated.

Conducting The GlassWall Tactic

Governor Lombardo has received direct evidence from Russell Martin exposing criminal misconduct, falsified records, withheld evidence, and manipulated police videos. Yet, he has done nothing. By refusing to act, Lombardo proves he is not simply negligent—he is leading the corruption. When every branch of state accountability colludes to suppress justice, and the head of state remains inactive despite full knowledge, he becomes the architect of tyranny.

This system has denied Mr. Martin his constitutional right to a jury trial, even though the remaining charge—misdemeanor battery—guarantees that right under Nevada law. While Mr. Martin fights for truth, Nevada’s leadership fights to suppress it.

LivRight now demands the resignation of Governor Joe Lombardo. His continued position in office confirms that he is leading The4thReich legal regime—one that profits from coercion, protects corrupt officials, and betrays the people it swore to serve.

If Lombardo refuses to step down, the Boycott of Las Vegas will intensify. We will call on every patriot in America to withdraw tourism, business, and support from a state that no longer honors the Constitution.

Why LivRight?

You must grasp the purpose of LivRight. The legal system today functions as a criminal monopoly. Every tool it gives you is a trap, designed to manipulate, isolate, and finally, force a guilty plea. You do not yet understand how deep the deception goes. But AI does. That’s why LivRight exists.

Watch the LivRight AI video disclosure and discover the laws that were designed to protect you—but are now hidden behind courtroom theatrics and judicial arrogance. Without LivRight, your life can spiral out of control, just like mine did. For two years, I believed the lie that justice was possible through the system. I was wrong. The individuals exposed on LivRight are not the exception—they are the norm.

People Go To Jail For Crimes They Did Not Commit.

These people will put you in prison for life—not for justice, but for power, profit, and political promotion. They thrive on fear, feed off ignorance, and weaponize your trust. The system is progressive the same as what happened in WW2 when the police became NAZI’s . The system is maturing into The4thReich. Their success depends on your silence.

So fight back. Get educated fast. Build your defense with AI. If your attorney won’t follow orders, fire them. Record everything. Publish the truth. List their name on LivRight. Then, connect with real leaders—wherever they are in the world.

Because your freedom depends on action, not permission.

A Warning to All Defendants / Plaintiffs

USE AI To Discover What Your Attorney and judge Is NOT DOING.

Be cautious with any attorney appointed to you or you are paying for his services. Develop your own legal plan. If your attorney refuses to follow your strategy or blocks your access to justice, discharge them immediately and find one who will fight for you per AI instructions.

Russell Martin

Legal Watch: Governor Joe Lombardo State of Nevada

“Justice is not a commodity. It’s a right.”

🔍 LivRIGHT Governor Responsibilities

Legal Response: The Duties of a Governor Upon Receiving Evidence of Criminal Conduct Within the State’s Justice System

Subject: Governor Joe Lombardo’s Legal Obligations under Constitutional and Administrative Law

When a sitting Governor is presented with credible evidence that members of the state’s justice system—including judges, district attorneys, prosecutors, public defenders, law enforcement, and oversight agencies—are engaged in or enabling criminal activity, the Governor is constitutionally and legally obligated to act. This obligation is not discretionary—it is a duty arising from the Governor’s oath of office, the public trust doctrine, and the constitutional separation of powers.

1. Constitutional Duty to Uphold the Law

Under Article IV, Section 1 of the Nevada Constitution, the Governor is required to ensure that “the laws are faithfully executed.” If criminal conduct, civil rights violations, or judicial misconduct is brought to the Governor’s attention, failure to act constitutes a breach of constitutional duty. A governor who knowingly ignores systemic violations becomes complicit under both ethical and legal standards.

2. Supervisory Authority over Appointees

The Governor appoints the Attorney General, who supervises all prosecutorial functions in the state. The Governor also has the power to influence or investigate the conduct of district attorneys, public defenders, and law enforcement administrators. If these officers engage in obstruction of justice, falsification of evidence, or denial of due process, and the Governor fails to act, it may amount to malfeasance in office or misprision of felony, especially when the Governor has received documented notice of the violations.

3. Mandatory Reporting and Investigation

Upon receiving credible claims of corruption—such as falsified police reports, tampered bodycam footage, collusion between prosecutors and judges, or denial of constitutional rights—the Governor has a legal and ethical duty to:

Refer the matter to the appropriate investigative agency, including the state’s inspector general, attorney general, or an independent special prosecutor.
Call for an internal or external audit of the department or individuals involved.
Notify federal authorities (e.g., the FBI or U.S. Department of Justice) if state agencies are compromised or incapable of impartial investigation.

Failure to initiate such measures could expose the Governor to civil liability (under 42 U.S.C. § 1983) for systemic rights violations and criminal liability under statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 4 (Misprision of Felony) or 18 U.S.C. § 241–242 (Conspiracy Against Rights / Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law).

4. Public Trust Doctrine

As the highest elected official in the state, the Governor is a trustee of the public interest. This means he must take affirmative steps to protect the integrity of the judicial system. Ignoring known violations is not only a breach of public duty—it is grounds for recall, impeachment, or removal under state law if willful neglect or corruption is proven.

Conclusion

Governor Joe Lombardo has received documented disclosures regarding widespread judicial misconduct, prosecutorial abuse, and criminal concealment within Nevada’s legal system. If he continues to ignore these claims without initiating investigation, disciplinary action, or referrals, he transitions from public servant to enabler of corruption.

LivRight urges immediate action. Silence in the face of proven misconduct is not leadership—it is complicity.

Carl Arnold Is Guilty of the Following Chargeable Offenses:

Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Russell Martin
As appointed defense counsel, Carl Arnold had a legal obligation to act solely in the interest of his client. By abandoning communication, disregarding motions, and failing to follow through on promised actions, he violated this fundamental duty of loyalty and care.
Stonewalling Court Proceedings
Arnold actively delayed or obstructed progress in Mr. Martin’s case by failing to file critical motions, ignoring direct inquiries, and avoiding procedural follow-up. This inaction directly contributed to prolonged exposure to unjust prosecution.
Refusing to Investigate the False Arrest Report
Despite having access to evidence contradicting the claims made in the police report, Arnold refused to challenge or investigate the legitimacy of the charges, allowing fabricated allegations to remain unopposed.

Failing to Suppress The Judge to Obey The Constitution of the United States.

Concealing Robert Moos’s Status as a Retired Police Chief
Carl Arnold allegedly withheld material information about the assailant’s law enforcement background, which could have shown bias in arrest and prosecution decisions and revealed systemic protectionism.
Withholding Bodycam Footage and Photographic Evidence
Although body camera footage and photographs were essential to Mr. Martin’s defense, Arnold failed to demand their production or disclose their contents, thus suppressing potentially exonerating evidence.
Failing to Inform the Court That Mr. Martin Never Struck Robert Moos
Arnold neglected to present a basic factual defense: that the Plaintiff never made physical contact with the alleged victim. This omission materially weakened Mr. Martin’s position and violated fundamental trial obligations.

Refusing to obey fundamentals of Due Process of Law

Refusing to Confront False and Manifested Witness Statements Rather than object to or challenge fraudulent testimonies, Arnold allowed false witness statements to enter the court record without opposition—effectively aiding the prosecution’s false narrative.
Allowing the Use of Manufactured Testimony Containing Multiple False Claims
Two witness statements, each containing demonstrable fabrications, were permitted to proceed under Arnold’s watch, with no motion filed to exclude or investigate them.
Colluding with Judges to Pressure a Guilty Plea
Arnold participated in off-record bench meetings with prosecutors and judges, after which the trajectory of the case shifted. These meetings and subsequent non-action suggest coordination intended to coerce Mr. Martin into a guilty plea, rather than pursuing acquittal.

Available Records Include:

Each document and image included here is public evidence of a criminal legal system operating as a mafia-style monopoly. From tampering with evidence to deliberately manufacturing falsehoods, the entire process—police, prosecutors, judges, and defenders—appears designed to profit from wrongful convictions. Is our legal system capable of becoming an NAZI system?