Carl Arnold Attorney Las Vegas NV or NAZI?

russmartin1June 3, 20250195 views

Carl Arnold Attorney is a representation of The4thReich influence to control the legal environment.

Carl Arnold Attorney

Statement from Russell Martin, Defendant

Carl Arnold: A Public Defender Entrenched in a Broken System

Carl Arnold Attorney, an outside public defender appointed in Las Vegas, was assigned to represent me—Russell Martin. From the very beginning, he exhibited arrogance and a sense of superiority in every interaction. Rather than communicate with me directly, he would only respond when my wife called from her phone, refusing to acknowledge my repeated attempts to reach him.

Beware of what the Lawyer Is Not Telling You!

After presenting him with all supporting documents, Carl Arnold agreed to file a Notice of Motion to change my plea from No Contest to Not Guilty. To his credit, this motion was successfully processed. Following that, he assured me that he would take the next step—filing a Notice of Motion to have the charges dismissed entirely (60 Days Done).

However, the situation quickly began to unravel. I observed Arnold being summoned to a private bench meeting with the prosecutor and the presiding judge. Following this closed-door session, he returned to inform me that the court date had been postponed. After that encounter, he stopped responding to my phone calls and emails altogether. Despite his earlier promises, he refused to file the motion to discharge the charges.

At that moment, I realized something had changed. Carl Arnold had become just another cog in the legal machinery I describe as the The4thReich NAZI system of justice. He adopted what I now call the “glass wall technique”—pretending to be my advocate while remaining completely inaccessible and obstructive. It became painfully clear that he was no longer interested in building a defense. His behavior matched a disturbing pattern I had already experienced with two previous attorneys.

Consequently, I discharged him—the third lawyer to fail me.

Why LivRight?

You must grasp the purpose of LivRight. The legal system today functions as a criminal monopoly. Every tool it gives you is a trap, designed to manipulate, isolate, and finally, force a guilty plea. You do not yet understand how deep the deception goes. But AI does. That’s why LivRight exists.

Watch the LivRight AI video disclosure and discover the laws that were designed to protect you—but are now hidden behind courtroom theatrics and judicial arrogance. Without LivRight, your life can spiral out of control, just like mine did. For two years, I believed the lie that justice was possible through the system. I was wrong. The individuals exposed on LivRight are not the exception—they are the norm.

People Go To Jail For Crimes They Did Not Commit.

These people will put you in prison for life—not for justice, but for power, profit, and political promotion. They thrive on fear, feed off ignorance, and weaponize your trust. The system is progressive the same as what happened in WW2 when the police became NAZI’s . The system is maturing into The4thReich. Their success depends on your silence.

So fight back. Get educated fast. Build your defense with AI. If your attorney won’t follow orders, fire them. Record everything. Publish the truth. List their name on LivRight. Then, connect with real leaders—wherever they are in the world.

Because your freedom depends on action, not permission.

⚠️ A Warning to All Defendants / Plaintiffs

USE AI To Discover What Your Attorney and judge Is NOT DOING.

Be cautious with any attorney appointed to you or you are paying for his services. Develop your own legal plan. If your attorney refuses to follow your strategy or blocks your access to justice, discharge them immediately and find one who will fight for you per AI instructions.

Russell Martin

Legal Watch: Carl Arnold Attorney – Las Vegas, NV

“Justice is not a commodity. It’s a right.”

🔍 LivRIGHT Public Defender Profile: Carl Arnold Attorney

Name: Carl Arnold
Position: Outside Appointed Public Defender, Las Vegas
Federal Case Context: Referenced in connection with Case No. 25-CV-636-APG-BNW
Status: Accused of failing to act on behalf of client, obstructing communication, and facilitating court-based suppression tactics
Allegations: Attorney misconduct, abandonment of client, failure to file motions, and passive participation in a coercive legal system

⚖️ Summary of Alleged Misconduct:

Carl Arnold Attorney was appointed to represent Russell Martin as a contract attorney during a critical stage of ongoing legal proceedings in Clark County. While initially cooperative—successfully filing a motion to change Mr. Martin’s plea from No Contest to Not Guilty—Arnold’s conduct quickly deteriorated. According to Mr. Martin, Arnold:

Refused to respond to direct communication, answering only when Martin’s wife called from a separate phone
Failed to file a promised motion to dismiss all charges, despite initial assurances
Participated in off-record bench meetings with prosecutors and judges, after which the court’s direction shifted without explanation
Ignored subsequent calls and emails, leaving the defendant without legal guidance
Adopted a passive, obstructionist role, allegedly serving court interests over client defense
Ultimately ceased providing any active representation, prompting his discharge by Mr. Martin

These actions, taken collectively, represent not just legal failure but systemic alignment with a justice system designed to silence, delay, and coerce.

🚨 Legal and Ethical Violations:

Violations of Professional Conduct (Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct)

RPC 1.1 – Competence: Failure to follow through on required legal action
RPC 1.3 – Diligence: Unresponsiveness and abandonment of post-plea advocacy
RPC 1.4 – Communication: Inadequate client communication, violating ethical standards
RPC 8.4 – Misconduct: Allowing outside influence to direct strategy, enabling injustice

Constitutional and Systemic Implications

Sixth Amendment: Denial of effective assistance of counsel
42 U.S.C. § 1983: Potential complicity in systemic civil rights violations
Obstruction by Omission: Enabling unlawful coercion through inaction and delay

🧨 Role in the Suppression of Defense Rights

Carl Arnold’s behavior is consistent with what Plaintiff Martin identifies as the legal behavior model of The4thReich—a judicial-industrial complex that seeks control, not justice. By failing to uphold the adversarial defense model, Arnold effectively functioned as an extension of the prosecutorial machine, rather than a defender of constitutional liberty.

His silence, delay, and ultimate disappearance from the defense strategy aligned with a larger pattern of suppressing courtroom resistance, misdirecting the case away from truth, and preparing the groundwork for coerced compliance.

💥 Impact on the Plaintiff:

Loss of legal time and motion advantage
Emotional distress from abandonment
Delay in case progress due to ineffective representation
Increased pressure to comply with prosecutorial demands
Forced self-representation under adverse procedural conditions

📣 Recommended Accountability Measures:

1. Nevada State Bar Complaint

File based on multiple violations of Rules of Professional Conduct
Submit evidence of ignored communications, motion failures, and withdrawal without cause

2. Judicial Oversight Filing

Notify court administrators of failure to uphold constitutional defense obligations
Request audit of all public defender conduct in related cases

3. Public LivRIGHT Disclosure

List Carl Arnold in LivRIGHT’s database of compromised defense counsel
Include public testimony, timeline, and motion record summary

📰 LivRIGHT Statement Template:

Carl Arnold: A Public Defender Who Abandoned His Post
In the middle of a constitutional crisis, Carl Arnold chose silence. Despite early promises to represent his client, he failed to file critical motions, refused to return communication, and ultimately withdrew from defense without explanation. He didn’t just disappear—he surrendered. In doing so, he left Russell Martin exposed to a system designed to convict, not to question. LivRIGHT calls for a full bar investigation, public exposure, and systemic reform.

Carl Arnold Is Guilty of the Following Chargeable Offenses:

Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Russell Martin
As appointed defense counsel, Carl Arnold had a legal obligation to act solely in the interest of his client. By abandoning communication, disregarding motions, and failing to follow through on promised actions, he violated this fundamental duty of loyalty and care.
Stonewalling Court Proceedings
Arnold actively delayed or obstructed progress in Mr. Martin’s case by failing to file critical motions, ignoring direct inquiries, and avoiding procedural follow-up. This inaction directly contributed to prolonged exposure to unjust prosecution.
Refusing to Investigate the False Arrest Report
Despite having access to evidence contradicting the claims made in the police report, Arnold refused to challenge or investigate the legitimacy of the charges, allowing fabricated allegations to remain unopposed.

Failing to Suppress The Judge to Obey The Constitution of the United States.

Concealing Robert Moos’s Status as a Retired Police Chief
Carl Arnold allegedly withheld material information about the assailant’s law enforcement background, which could have shown bias in arrest and prosecution decisions and revealed systemic protectionism.
Withholding Bodycam Footage and Photographic Evidence
Although body camera footage and photographs were essential to Mr. Martin’s defense, Arnold failed to demand their production or disclose their contents, thus suppressing potentially exonerating evidence.
Failing to Inform the Court That Mr. Martin Never Struck Robert Moos
Arnold neglected to present a basic factual defense: that the Plaintiff never made physical contact with the alleged victim. This omission materially weakened Mr. Martin’s position and violated fundamental trial obligations.

Refusing to obey fundamentals of Due Process of Law

Refusing to Confront False and Manifested Witness Statements Rather than object to or challenge fraudulent testimonies, Arnold allowed false witness statements to enter the court record without opposition—effectively aiding the prosecution’s false narrative.
Allowing the Use of Manufactured Testimony Containing Multiple False Claims
Two witness statements, each containing demonstrable fabrications, were permitted to proceed under Arnold’s watch, with no motion filed to exclude or investigate them.
Colluding with Judges to Pressure a Guilty Plea
Arnold participated in off-record bench meetings with prosecutors and judges, after which the trajectory of the case shifted. These meetings and subsequent non-action suggest coordination intended to coerce Mr. Martin into a guilty plea, rather than pursuing acquittal.

Available Records Include:

Each document and image included here is public evidence of a criminal legal system operating as a mafia-style monopoly. From tampering with evidence to deliberately manufacturing falsehoods, the entire process—police, prosecutors, judges, and defenders—appears designed to profit from wrongful convictions. Is our legal system capable of becoming an NAZI system?